This question gets asked all the time, but usually it’s framed the wrong way. So let’s rework it. The real issue isn’t whether a woman can work outside the home. The issue is whether her work stays tethered to the home. And for that matter, men need that tether too. The difference is just the length.
Marriage isn’t two people chasing dreams side-by-side. It’s the establishing of a household—people, property, name, and legacy. That takes work. It takes structure. And it takes roles arising from men's and women's differing sexuality. A household isn’t static. It’s meant to grow. Children join it. Sometimes servants or hired hands. But at the center is the marriage—and the calling of that marriage is productivity. Everyone works. That’s baked into creation.
The home is the center of the household, but it’s not the boundary. A household extends outward—into the field, the church, the community, the workplace. And the members of the household, each in their own way, help extend those borders. That includes more people, more property, more stability, and more influence.
A man who goes off to war or work doesn’t cut ties with his household. He represents it. He fights for it. His reputation reflects on it. Same with the Proverbs 31 woman. She buys land, sells goods, and deals in trade—but she does it with her household in view. Her work serves the home. Even the older woman helping a younger mom next door is doing the work of her household. She’s reinforcing the kind of culture and maturity that strengthens her own.
So when we come back to the question—should a woman work outside the home—the answer is, yes, if the tether holds.
God made men and women to work, but He didn’t make them interchangeable. A man’s work often pushes further out into the wild. Think of a couple who buys an old house on overgrown land. The man’s out there with a saw, cutting down trash trees and clearing a path. It’s hard, physical work. He comes back scraped up and exhausted, and he should. That’s part of his glory.
Meanwhile, the woman takes what he’s cleared and turns it into something livable. She plans the garden, picks the spot for the kids’ play area, brings order and beauty. He breaks ground. She makes it grow. Both sweat. Both build. But the nature and the reach of their work are different.
No work should be untethered from the home. And when a woman tries to live as if her tether is the same length as a man’s—or as if she doesn’t need one at all—she’s not just making a lifestyle choice. She’s rejecting the design. And that always brings consequences.
God didn’t make women for combat. That doesn’t mean they’re not strong. It means their strength is aimed somewhere else. Toward nurture. Toward culture-making. Toward the kind of productivity that requires roots.
Women were made to contribute, fully and joyfully. But they were made to do it with a shorter tether. That’s not a limitation. That’s their design. And when honored, it builds the kind of homes that can stand for generations.
Discussion about this post
No posts
Always appreciate the keen insights. Well worded things like this are a huge help as I pastor and navigate the landscape out here.
The real issue is should be be a servant/slave to someone else:
1) The man is required to provide with the wife as the helpmate that may help him do that. Any exceptions would be an exigent situation, not the norm.
2) The biggest issue is that by making her a wage-slave you've given her another authority; she now has two heads. This is confusion.